Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61128 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 07:55:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 07:55:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 82023 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 07:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82000 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 07:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 81975 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2005 07:55:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (HELO smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.12.11.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Fri, 20 May 2005 00:55:20 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.31?) (reinhard?poetz@62.178.239.20 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 May 2005 07:55:05 -0000 Message-ID: <428D97D5.1000002@apache.org> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:55:01 +0200 From: Reinhard Poetz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Log messages of category "sitemap" References: <425BD7AF.3090505@apache.org> <428C202E.7060708@apache.org> <428C8BF0.40708@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <428C8BF0.40708@reverycodes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > >> Reinhard Poetz wrote: >> >>> Is it me or do others have the same problem that no log messages of >>> the category "sitemap" reach the logger output? (core and access >>> works for me) >>> >>> I have the same problem with the latest trunk and with a version that >>> is about 2 weeks old. A very recent 2.1.X checkout works fine for me ... >>> >> >> Is it only me who has this problem? Can somebody confirm this? > > > Don't know about trunk, 2.1 is fine. yes, 2.1 works for me too. Anybody experiences with trunk? (I want to make sure that it's not a local problem but a general one) -- Reinhard P�tz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach {Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon} web(log): http://www.poetz.cc --------------------------------------------------------------------