Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-73821-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77270 invoked from network); 3 May 2005 06:31:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2005 06:31:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 28218 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2005 06:32:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28110 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2005 06:32:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28032 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2005 06:32:06 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (HELO smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com)
 (217.12.11.34)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 02 May 2005 23:32:06 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.31?) (reinhard?poetz@62.178.239.20
 with plain)
  by smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 May 2005 06:30:20 -0000
Message-ID: <42771A76.5000801@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 08:30:14 +0200
From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Continuation invalidation strategy
References: <4275DF46.2020408@apache.org> <4275FA3B.2070402@mobilebox.pl>
 <42760323.7080804@apache.org> <427659BB.3010904@apache.org>
 <42765DBB.1030803@mobilebox.pl> <4276A189.8090409@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4276A189.8090409@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
> 
>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>
>>> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>
>>
> 
> <snip/>
> 
>>>> Are there any problems if a parent continuation is removed before 
>>>> its children, except that the user can't jump back?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The execution state of a continuation is dependent on it's parent 
>>> state. So although we may trash parent webcontinuations (i.e. the 
>>> enveloppe used by the continuation manager), we must ensure that a 
>>> strong link exists with the parent state.
>>
>>
>> Looks like there is something I am not aware of. What 'state' do you 
>> refer to. What would have happened if you just sent parent 
>> continuation to null?
> 
> 
> 
> The Rhino scope, which is a rather important piece of information :-)

The Rhino scope is still in the user's session and only deleted when the session 
is invalidated and shouldn't be affected by invalidating a continuation, AFAIU. 
Right?

-- 
Reinhard P�tz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------