Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24185 invoked from network); 16 May 2005 16:30:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2005 16:30:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 31068 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 14:13:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30937 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 14:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30885 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2005 14:13:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from keow.org (HELO keow.org) (69.41.247.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 07:13:32 -0700 Received: (qmail 7960 invoked by uid 1000); 16 May 2005 14:13:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:13:17 +0100 From: Tim Larson To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: CForms icons problem Message-ID: <20050516141316.GA3838@localhost> References: <42861153.2020902@mobilebox.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42861153.2020902@mobilebox.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:55:15PM +0200, Leszek Gawron wrote: > Am I the only one to have images coming from cocoon-forms-block.jar > broken? They are ok in src folder but they aren't properly rendered by > the browser. This is not the case of my browser because the same tool on > src/ as on unpacked jar. I have the same problem, as I reported earlier. A completely fresh checkout of cocoon in a new directory and a fresh compile of this checkout by a freshly downloaded j2sdk1.4.2_08 DID -NOT- solve it. To be clear, this problem is with svn trunk only...the 2_1_X branch works fine for me. --Tim Larson