cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leszek Gawron <lgaw...@mobilebox.pl>
Subject Re: [VOTE RESULTS] CForms instruction set for jxtg rendering vs. jx-macros.xml file
Date Tue, 17 May 2005 18:16:03 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> I have refactored JXTG recently so now instructions like jx:for, jx:if 
> are defined in separate file: 
> src/block/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/template-instructions.xml 
> 
> 
> Right now we are rendering forms in jxtg using a macro file which is 
> kind of ugly IMO - see yourself: 
> src/blocks/forms/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/jx-macros.xml
> 
> I could fairly easily reimplement jx-macros.xml into more elegant java 
> solution by implementing a separate set of instructions like ft:widget, 
> ft:repeater and so on. If you let me of course.
> 
> I do not want to start a tag library war. If cforms and jxtg are core 
> features they should closely support each other.
> 
> This is NOT the case of allowing arbitrary instruction sets to be 
> created. CForms case only.
> 
> Plase cast your votes:
> [ ] Yes go for it.
2 in favour: me and Upayavira

> [ ] It's a bad idea - leave jx-macros.xml untouched!
> [ ] It's not jx-macros.xml fault. CForms should be changed if current
>     solution isn't right.
2 in favour: Daniel and Vadim

So what now?
-- 
Leszek Gawron                                      lgawron@mobilebox.pl
IT Manager                                         MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                              http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65

Mime
View raw message