cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leszek Gawron <>
Subject [VOTE] CForms instruction set for jxtg rendering vs. jx-macros.xml file
Date Wed, 11 May 2005 14:00:37 GMT
I have refactored JXTG recently so now instructions like jx:for, jx:if 
are defined in separate file: 

Right now we are rendering forms in jxtg using a macro file which is 
kind of ugly IMO - see yourself: 

I could fairly easily reimplement jx-macros.xml into more elegant java 
solution by implementing a separate set of instructions like ft:widget, 
ft:repeater and so on. If you let me of course.

I do not want to start a tag library war. If cforms and jxtg are core 
features they should closely support each other.

This is NOT the case of allowing arbitrary instruction sets to be 
created. CForms case only.

Plase cast your votes:
[ ] Yes go for it.
[ ] It's a bad idea - leave jx-macros.xml untouched!
[ ] It's not jx-macros.xml fault. CForms should be changed if current
     solution isn't right.

Leszek Gawron                            
IT Manager                                         MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                    
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65

View raw message