Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94051 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2005 19:53:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2005 19:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 44666 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2005 19:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 44639 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2005 19:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 44623 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2005 19:53:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from dsl092-029-059.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO unet.scdi.org) (66.92.29.59) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:53:43 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([81.13.211.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by unet.scdi.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j3HJrchT025273; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:53:39 -0700 Message-ID: <4262BECA.7050805@bruchez.org> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:53:46 +0200 From: Erik Bruchez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (Windows/20041201) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [CocoonInAction] 2 new articles References: <4260D62C.2050403@apache.org> <426138F8.8040709@apache.org> <4262AA8F.8080103@bruchez.org> <4262B837.1040906@alma.nu> In-Reply-To: <4262B837.1040906@alma.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.18 () AWL,NO_RDNS2,SMILEY X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 66.92.29.59 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mats wrote: > A lot of statements about cocoon have no description of the > functionality or the possibilities, instead they focus on "Not > recommended", "yes, but limited", "possible but not encouraged", > "Undocumented. May be possible with TrAX." To me this is pure > marketing junk. :) It's interesting to know that this is the effect that comparison matrix can have. This said, I will stop mentioning the name of our project here. As Sebastien pointed out, it is a Cocoon development mailing-list. I just wanted to react to the criticism that the comparison had "wrong" points, and mention my frustration of not hearing specifics. Now I have heard a couple, and will try to act on that. But keep in mind that it is a very difficult exercise to compare technological solutions, and it is even more difficult to do so without being criticized. > I certainly don�t want you to get offended by this mail, Erik. Not at all! -Erik