Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76862 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2005 19:04:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 19:04:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 83527 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2005 19:03:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 83416 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2005 19:03:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 83374 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2005 19:03:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from odoko.co.uk (HELO odoko.co.uk) (80.68.92.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:03:24 -0700 Received: from elfriedeholmes.demon.co.uk ([80.177.165.206] helo=[10.0.0.3]) by odoko.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DM9cc-0002N5-OI for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: <425EBE6F.4010800@upaya.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:03:11 +0100 From: Upayavira User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Do we want a GUI installer? References: <200504141751.j3EHpcjM009769@mira.taygeta.com> <425EB698.1060706@upaya.co.uk> <425EBB3D.1050206@nada.kth.se> In-Reply-To: <425EBB3D.1050206@nada.kth.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Upayavira wrote: > >> Skip Carter wrote: >> >>> I'd rather not see one. At least if one is developed, >>> there needs remain to be a way to install from the command >>> line. ALL of my cocoon installations are on headless systems, >>> and some of them are remote, so a GUI is not really very practical. >> >> >> >> There is no way that such an installer would replace the current >> system, merely augment it. This installer is nothing more than a >> wrapper around our existing Ant scripts anyway. After all, many Cocoon >> installations are on headless servers. The intention was to smooth >> over that early stage of usage when someone is at the beginning of >> learning Cocoon. Throwing them into having to copy and edit text files >> when they first start IMO introduces complexity that they could well >> do with learning a little later in their involvement with Cocoon. >> >> But, having said that, it doesn't seem like people are that keen on >> the idea anyway. > > > If the user can get all the way to start Jetty with our demos through a > simple GUI, I find it a good idea. Even if I'm perfectly able to read a > README and run ant or make when I evaluate some new software, IMO the > sooner I can start to evaluate what it does the better. > > The easier we can make using Cocoon, the better IMO. Cocoon is an > excelent tool for complicted stuff, my goal is to help making simple > things simple ;) So if you can fix the licence problems you have my +1 > at least. That's my thinking too. If we want to put complexity in front of people to scare them away, we just need to put Cocoon in front of them :-) Regards, Upayavira