cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Antonio Gallardo" <agalla...@agssa.net>
Subject Re: Directory structure of blocks
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2005 06:17:28 GMT
On Mar, 12 de Abril de 2005, 0:59, Reinhard Poetz dijo:
> Geoff Howard wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2005 4:57 PM, Vadim Gritsenko <vadim@reverycodes.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>>
>>>>I don't know why we named it "COB-INF" but there was (still is?) a good
>>>>reason for this because I remember some long discussion.
>>>
>>>IIRC, reason was to avoid conflict with avalon/phoenix/somesuch
>>>BLOCK-INF/block.xml, hence COB (Cocoon Block).
>>
>>
>> Yes.  See [1] and [2] (first post got "orphaned" from the rest of the
>> thread in the archive)
>>
>> Also, I assume you've seen [3]?
>>
>> - Geoff
>>
>> 1 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106510643100003&r=1&w=2
>> 2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106510548208709&w=2
>> 3 http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BlocksFSLayout
>>
>
> Thanks Geoff and Vadim
>
> as we already had a vote, we should respect the result and have following
> intra-block file-system structure:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> [cocoon block] [DIR]
>   |
>   +-- COB-INF [DIR]
>        +-- block.xml
>        +-- classes [DIR]
>        +-- lib [DIR]
> --------------------------------------------------------------

Is posible to change the name from:

block.xml -> cob.xml

I see the analogy to WEB-INF/ --> web.xml.

IMHO this is to keep the same name and avoid confusions. ;-)

WDYT?

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo


Mime
View raw message