cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira>
Subject Re: Daisy as a docs editor (was Re: [CocoonInAction] Opening announce)
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:12:42 GMT
Ross Gardler wrote:
> [Cross posted to Forrest-Dev for obvious reasons]
> Steven Noels wrote:
>> On 15 Apr 2005, at 00:09, Linden H van der (MI) wrote:
>>> If someone would offer a Cocoon hosting or Daisy hosting for the
>>> project, I personnaly be happy to move the content there.
>> Stay tuned.
> Interesting, that is my response too.
> I'm about to go away for nearly a week so cannot participate in any 
> discussion. However, since Steven clearly has some plans in this area I 
> may as well mention my own - which I hope will be compatible.
> I am using Daisy internally and am building a plugin for Forrest that 
> allows users to include Daisy pages in their Forrest sites. The current 
> status of the plugin is that it includes the text of documents from 
> multiple repositories. It needs some URL rewriting to make things like 
> images work. I will commit what I have to the Forrest whiteboard area in 
> case anyone wants to have a play. I intend to finish this after Forrest 
> has released 0.7 (we're working on the final leg of that release right 
> now).
> Why is this significant?
> If Steven is going to be able to source/offer Cocoon hosting, with a 
> Daisy Wiki then we get some pretty powerful options, that compliment the 
> proposal at 
> very well:
> Daisy Wiki is used as the document creation/editing tool. Daisy provides 
> a basic edit/review/publish workflow so quality control remains the 
> domain of committers.
> Forrest is used to generate the site, but rather than having a separate 
> repository via SVN it works directly with the Daisy repository using the 
> new plugin. The plugin can be set to always retrieve the current live 
> page in the daisy repository, i.e. the one that has been approved for 
> publication.
> This means that the Daisy Wiki will make the alpha docs available, 
> whilst the cocoon site will show the published docs.
> A further benefit of this two phased publication approach is that we can 
> avoid the unstructured navigation of an evolving wiki site. The idea of 
> the Forrest plugin is that you can have a separate site definition from 
> that defined in the daisy repository. Consequently the cocoon site can 
> ignore internal documents (such as the one above about the documentation 
> system) and instead focus on docs interested to users and potential users.
> It would also be possible to have a separate site organisation for 
> developers, marketeers, users, committers etc. etc. All documents would 
> come from the same central repository, we just maintain a different 
> forrest site.xml file for each of the sites.
> Note - there would have to be some work to handle links from pages that 
> are in Daisy, but not yet published on the main site. I haven't thought 
> about how to handle those yet, perhaps point them at a holding page 
> explaining the document is an alpha document, then providing a link to 
> the daisy wiki.
> Anyway, I'll catch up on any discussion when I come back, or I'll just 
> let you know when the plugin is complete.

This is interesting, and could make doc work easier. Now, I would really 
rather see the daisy app run on Apache hardware. Now, if Steven can 
provide us with temporary hosting, as he did with the wiki (even if 
temporary was rather long in duration there!), that might make this 
system work well.

Regards, Upayavira

View raw message