cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Directory structure of blocks
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:47:58 GMT
Geoff Howard wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2005 2:33 AM, Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>>Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is posible to change the name from:
>>>block.xml -> cob.xml
>>
>>ATM everything is possible ;-)
>>
>>
>>>I see the analogy to WEB-INF/ --> web.xml.
>>>IMHO this is to keep the same name and avoid confusions. ;-)
>>>WDYT?
>>
>>fine for me too, so we have
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>>[cocoon block] [DIR]
>>   +-- COB-INF [DIR]
>>       +-- cob.xml
>>       +-- classes [DIR]
>>       +-- lib [DIR]
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>WDOT?
> 
> 
> I don't think the inconsistency (COB-INF -> block.xml) is a big deal. 
> There is also a META-INF and it does not have a meta.xml in it.
> 
> In fact, it would have the added benefit of helping people guess what
> the heck a "COB" is if they are just browsing around the FS.  I think
> this argument was made before.

agreed. I like block.xml better.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message