cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RFC-2396 (Was: Re: [RT] composition vs. inheritance in blocks)
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:07:41 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> "Pier" == Pier Fumagalli <pier@betaversion.org> writes:
>>>>>>>           
>>
>>
>>    Pier> I'm already slightly "upset" about the "cocoon://" protocol,
>>    Pier> as it does not follow the URI RFC properly, I'd like to
>>    Pier> address the problem as early as possible...
>>
>>    Pier> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
>>
>> I don't know if this is relevant to the discussion, but are you aware
>> that this RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 3986?
>>  
>>
> It has some relevance to the discussion as it seem (chap 3.) to allow a 
> hierarchical URI at the form:
> 
>  cocoon:foo/bar
> 
> where "foo/bar" is called a root less path. But I don't find any 
> explanation about what it is supposed to mean.

that's the point of a general URI syntax: the meaning is not defined. 
It's just XML for strings really. The semantics are not defined there.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message