Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <56995.165.98.153.184.1110997145.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050316181156.GF23086@localhost>
References: <423825BF.4090109@apache.org> <20050316134610.GC23086@localhost>
    <42383B6B.70005@reverycodes.com> <423841D8.1090102@nada.kth.se>
    <53310.165.98.153.184.1110987915.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
    <423857E3.6040506@nada.kth.se> <42385BA3.8000600@apache.org>
    <54625.165.98.153.184.1110990271.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
    <42386478.5030605@apache.org>
    <56308.165.98.153.184.1110995949.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
    <20050316181156.GF23086@localhost>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:19:05 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Supported and unsupported blocks
From: "Antonio Gallardo" <agallardo@agssa.net>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-6.FC2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal

On Mie, 16 de Marzo de 2005, 12:11, Tim Larson dijo:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:59:09AM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> On Mie, 16 de Marzo de 2005, 10:53, Reinhard Poetz dijo:
>> > Can anyone of you explain to me why it should be harmful following the
>> > proposed
>> > directory structure? I understand that some of you think that it is
>> > useless for
>> > you, but some of us (Carsten, Daniel, Bertrand, I, and maybe some
>> others)
>> > appreciate this information at directory level.
>>
>> Upayavira already answered this.
>>
>> Lets start a vote? need we to discuss more the topic?
>
> I do not need to discuss more, as Upayavira captured my thoughts
> on the matter very well.  Since we do not have a vote thread
> started yet, my *opinion* is +1 flat structure, -0 directories.
> (i.e. Strongly prefer flat, but would not try to veto directories.)

Same here.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.
>
> --Tim Larson
>