Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88443 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2005 05:17:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2005 05:17:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 61476 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 21:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 61107 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 21:48:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 60903 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2005 21:48:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,PLING_QUERY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from dsl092-088-147.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO chuckie.quoininc.com) (66.92.88.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:48:46 -0800 Received: from loghost ([66.92.88.146] helo=phoenix.quoininc.com) by chuckie.quoininc.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCPKl-0006cn-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:48:43 -0500 Received: from phoenix0.a.quoininc.com ([10.237.91.1] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by phoenix.quoininc.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCPSZ-00062A-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:56:47 -0500 Message-ID: <423B4C30.7020606@quoininc.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:46:24 -0500 From: "Eric E. Meyer" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Cocoon Performance Woes, Is it flow? I don't know! References: <4239BED0.7090906@quoininc.com> <49419.165.98.153.184.1111169193.squirrel@www.agssa.net> In-Reply-To: <49419.165.98.153.184.1111169193.squirrel@www.agssa.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: >Can you post the sizes of the returned pages in the thread? I guess this >is an important point too. > > The pages are roughly similar in size: home page: / 17.54 KB (17964 bytes) search1: /luxury_hotels/europe__france__paris/index.html 29.88 KB (30599 bytes) search2: /luxury_hotels/bahamas_%26_the_caribbean/beach_resort/index.html 29.33 KB (30037 bytes) search3: /luxury_hotels/europe__france__paris/city_centre_location/index.html 30.29 KB (31017 bytes) detail: /luxury_hotel/new_york,_ny/the_carlyle 25.65 KB (26267 bytes) >Also, consider to move to cocoon 2.1.6, now here is why: > >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31760 > >I saw you canged some pools inside tomcat. Did you changed some cocoon >pools? Did you adjusted cocoon memory usage inside cocoon.xconf? > > Hm - I didn't (until just now) see that there were pool sizes specified in the cocoon.xconf. These are the values that I have I removed the store janitor and switched both the store and transient-store to Whirly Cache. com.whirlycott.cache.impl.ConcurrentHashMapImpl 10 com.whirlycott.cache.policy.LFUMaintenancePolicy 10000 com.whirlycott.cache.impl.ConcurrentHashMapImpl 10 com.whirlycott.cache.policy.LFUMaintenancePolicy 10000 Regards, Eric Meyer