Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4238B0F7.4060704@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:19:35 +0100
From: Sylvain Wallez <sylvain@apache.org>
Organization: Anyware Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Cocoon issue
References: <9F61F758A669B34A93BA1A4179F8CE6201CA01D4@mail.optiosoftware.com>
 <42388ABD.7060802@reverycodes.com>
In-Reply-To: <42388ABD.7060802@reverycodes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

>> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@apache.org]
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for informing us about this possible issue - now, without the
>> concrete test case we can't do anything, we are searching for this
>> possible bug for a long time, but where never able to find it.
>> Please report your problems (together with the test case) to the cocoon
>> developer list. Then either we or any other Cocoon committer will help
>> you asap.
>
>
> I'm not sure what are the two "Cocoon processes" below, but exactly 
> same problem (Cocoon object was not re-entrant) was fixed for 
> situation when Cocoon Portal invokes Cocoon JSR168Portlet. So it might 
> be fixed in 2.1.6.


I encountered this problem in Cocoon application where we wanted to use 
the CocoonBean to produce the snapshot of a website as the result of an 
http request.

I guess this is what is meant by "two Cocoon processes": two Cocoon 
systems running in a single JVM and calling each other.

This problem has been fixed in 2.1.6.

Sylvain

-- 
Sylvain Wallez                        Anyware Technologies
http://apache.org/~sylvain            http://anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member     Research & Technology Director