Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81533 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2005 22:45:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2005 22:45:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 89887 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2005 22:45:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89373 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2005 22:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89360 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2005 22:45:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from dd2020.kasserver.com (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:45:36 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.103] (p54849DDF.dip.t-dialin.net [84.132.157.223]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1481AC7BF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:45:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42376583.5060503@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:45:23 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Supported and unsupported blocks References: <42281CF4.9050907@apache.org> <422F2607.7040907@apache.org> <422F2E2A.9040600@upaya.co.uk> <423018A8.3070609@apache.org> <42301D78.60201@nada.kth.se> <4236A792.2020800@apache.org> <52dc9a7562eb21a6c1b5122368bde425@apache.org> <42375E18.8000301@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <42375E18.8000301@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig12CB07ABE38EC17444203830" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig12CB07ABE38EC17444203830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>> ...Where shall we draw the line between "supported" and >>> "unsupported"? Is it really the "two committers rule" that I applied >>> above?... >> >> >> >> How about adding another condition: a block can only have "supported" >> status if we have automated tests for all its critical functions? > > > > That's a very interesting point. > +1, even if I'm not the most productive test writer :-) > >> This might make a big difference in the accountability of supported >> stuff in our releases. > > > > Yep. But this also means the core is currently unsupported ;-P Hehe... Well, time to write some test then ;-P Actually I somehow like the idea of required tests! And it would also clearly draw the line. Much better than the two-committer rule. ...but a lot of work :-/ cheers -- Torsten --------------enig12CB07ABE38EC17444203830 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCN2WNBGM6V3wgCUERAs/KAJ0Y2KINquvWcOWGVWvu6xY7EnFEagCfTsld lh4FpKgAqvOWZHYUU+FLsCw= =VOL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig12CB07ABE38EC17444203830--