From dev-return-72356-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Tue Mar 15 22:13:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66123 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2005 22:13:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2005 22:13:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 41195 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2005 22:13:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 40657 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2005 22:13:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 40629 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2005 22:13:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (HELO postfix4-2.free.fr) (213.228.0.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:13:47 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (lns-vlq-39f-81-56-134-235.adsl.proxad.net [81.56.134.235]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4F42EC5BA for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:13:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42375E18.8000301@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:13:44 +0100 From: Sylvain Wallez Organization: Anyware Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Supported and unsupported blocks References: <42281CF4.9050907@apache.org> <422F2607.7040907@apache.org> <422F2E2A.9040600@upaya.co.uk> <423018A8.3070609@apache.org> <42301D78.60201@nada.kth.se> <4236A792.2020800@apache.org> <52dc9a7562eb21a6c1b5122368bde425@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <52dc9a7562eb21a6c1b5122368bde425@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 15 mars 05, à 10:14, Reinhard Poetz a écrit : > >> ...Where shall we draw the line between "supported" and >> "unsupported"? Is it really the "two committers rule" that I applied >> above?... > > > How about adding another condition: a block can only have "supported" > status if we have automated tests for all its critical functions? That's a very interesting point. +1, even if I'm not the most productive test writer :-) > This might make a big difference in the accountability of supported > stuff in our releases. Yep. But this also means the core is currently unsupported ;-P Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://apache.org/~sylvain http://anyware-tech.com Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director