cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Antonio Gallardo" <>
Subject Re: Supported and unsupported blocks
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:07:38 GMT
On Mie, 16 de Marzo de 2005, 9:59, Daniel Fagerstrom dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>On Mie, 16 de Marzo de 2005, 8:25, Daniel Fagerstrom dijo:
> <snip/>
>>>Am I and Reinhard the only ones that are concerned about what the 50+
>>>blocks in an unordered lump in Cocoon does for the perception about our
>>Well, I need to say I am not concerned. Playing with the directory
>>structure is not good. I can see in the future people mails:
>>                             - O -
>>mail: "I canot find the block 'X' in the 'supported' dir as is stated in
>>the mail 'Y'.
>>reply: "No it was noved to contributted lat week on the SVN"
>>re:reply: "It will be on the "resurected" block the next week
> You are exagerating quite a bit ;)

Yep. I know. But the mails will be there.

> The proposed life cycle of block is rather:
> * You get a cool new idea and create a contributed block.
> * After a while it might have happened that a number of other developers
> also have become interested in the block and have started to contribute.
> At this point someone starts a vote about that the block should become a
> supported block, and people agree.
> * After some years it might happen that new technology or something else
> makes the block less relevant and someone start a vote about deprecating
> it.

The lifecycle was agreed for the community, the point is if a directory
structure is the best to implement it. Other people (me included) think it
can be implemented using the metadata file that all in all every block
will have.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

View raw message