cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Bidirectional relationships for blocks?
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:50:01 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> I might be wrong but I think up to now we only talked about one block
> depending on another block and this is then a one-way relationship.
> 
> But what if we need a bidirectional relationship? I have currently two
> examples:
> a) Skins
> We briefly talked about one use-case for blocks: skins. You factor out
> the layout of your application into a skin block and then can simply
> switch to a different block implementing the skin contract. Now, what if
> the skin block needs some information from the "application block" like
> some user settings or whatever?
> 
> b) Plugins or portlets
> I could imagine to bundle portles for the cocoon portal engine as simple
> blocks conforming to a cocoon portlet contract. So the portal block uses
> the portlet blocks, but in addition a portlet block needs access to some
> portal services.
> The same would apply if you would use the block concept to implement
> some kind of plugins.
> 
> Does this make sense? Or is this FS?

feels FS to me. Bidi relationships are *very* painful (living in a world 
of owl:inverseFunctionalProperty), I would strongly suggest to stay away 
from it.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message