cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>
Subject Re: Supported and unsupported blocks
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:37:54 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> 
>> Le 15 mars 05, à 10:14, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
>>
>>> ...Where shall we draw the line between "supported" and 
>>> "unsupported"? Is it really the "two committers rule" that I applied 
>>> above?...
>>
>>
>> How about adding another condition: a block can only have "supported" 
>> status if we have automated tests for all its critical functions?

Presense of the tests is enough, or you want to require that tests must run 
without failures? ;-P


> That's a very interesting point.
> +1, even if I'm not the most productive test writer :-)
> 
>> This might make a big difference in the accountability of supported 
>> stuff in our releases.
> 
> 
> Yep. But this also means the core is currently unsupported ;-P

Including all of the blocks, as well.

Vadim

Mime
View raw message