Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>> As discussed in various threads we need a common environment model
>> for flow, templating (both with flow and non-flow input). And it will
>> also make Cocoon easier to learn if the environment part of FOM (let
>> us call it OM) and the sitemap environment model, i.e. input modules
>> (IMs) are put together in some way.
>
> it would make sense to also look at whether output modules still make
> sense, and if yes, how to support those. they look like a hack to me,
> but maybe i'm missing something.
IIRC they where designed to be used for XSP actions and in DB contexts,
but I have not used them for such things and for use together with flow
they seem unnecesary complicated for my taste. So I don't know if output
modules make sense anymore either.
/Daniel
|