cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: Supported and unsupported blocks
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:56:44 GMT
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Whenever I work as trainer or consultant and Cocoon is the subject, people 
> always ask me the same questions about maturity and community of Cocoon and 
> its blocks. We should tell our users clearly what *we* consider as 
> "supported", "deprecated" and "committed" and then everybody can decide 
> himself what he does with this information.
> The wiki page is only an indicator which should help us to decide to get an 
> answer on the community aspect which is one part of the answer which state 
> a block has (the others are interface stability, implementation stability 
> and available automated tests).

The things that disturb me are the name "supported" and the list of committers.
Perhaps we should remove that Wiki page once the "job" is done.

> Additionally I like Bertrands idea of a more verbose description of a block 
> status, that could be part of every block documentation (see 
> for 
> details).



View raw message