Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27456 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 18:57:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 18:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18296 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2005 18:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 18221 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2005 18:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 18206 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2005 18:57:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:57:06 -0800 Received: (qmail 27341 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 18:57:02 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 18:57:02 -0000 Message-ID: <421E2403.9060305@apache.org> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:59:15 +0100 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Does scratchpad really depend on XSP? References: <421CD5C0.5070109@apache.org> <421CE3C6.7010301@dslextreme.com> <421CEA0C.2040903@apache.org> <48982.165.98.147.95.1109239949.squirrel@www.agssa.net> In-Reply-To: <48982.165.98.147.95.1109239949.squirrel@www.agssa.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Yep. I did. :( .... but we can freely remove them! :-) > > We are refactoring the OJB block and I blieve we can get rid of the dumb > XSP samples we currently have. > > Vadim is currently running a VOTE to mark OJB stable. I believe we can > write some new samples for OJB using flow + cforms. In fact I already > started to write them. But finding myself without enough time to finish > them. :-( > > Perhaps on weekend or one hour daily should be enough to finish them > before a potential release. > > In short, feel free to remove the XSP samples in OJB block. > I will leave them as is and wait for your rewritten samples ;) We should try to have OJB xsp free before the 2.1.7 release. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/