Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69699 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2005 18:32:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 18:32:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17619 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2005 18:32:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 17548 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2005 18:32:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 17535 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2005 18:32:40 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mout.perfora.net (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:32:38 -0800 Received: from minotaur.apache.org[209.237.227.194] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mrelay.perfora.net with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKz1m-1D1qS20CqN-0006WB; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:32:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4214E340.1030300@reverycodes.com> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:32:32 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r151511 - in cocoon/trunk/src/blocks/ojb: WEB-INF/xconf/cocoon-ojb.xconf java/org/apache/cocoon/ojb/components/AbstractOjbImpl.java References: <20050205171222.40991.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <4204FEC0.40907@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4204FEC0.40907@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:e2e4156964dfbcc4c642ec658fa7f9b9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > I just fixed the problems with the ojb-block in trunk; haven't checked > if they exist in 2.1.x as well. > > The different implementations (PB, ODMG) all inherit from > AbstractOjbImpl that in turn uses a datasource class. This datasource > class is based on static methods. So if you have configured two > implementations (PB and ODMG), the static methods of the datasource are > called twice and this results in an error! > > So there must be something wrong with this I guess ;) Should be fixed now. I enabled all other impls back. Vadim