cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Oliver <>
Subject Re: JS versus Java [was Re: FOM inconsistency (was Re: [VOTE] Unrestricting
Date Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:00 GMT
>Christopher Oliver wrote:
>> At any rate, I fail to understand how a massively non-backward 
>> compatible change can be made which was not even relevant to the subject 
>> voted on.
>yes please, can we discuss this again (with a final vote) as I'm not really 
>convinced about the pros of this change.
>> As I understand it there was a vote to "unrestrict" the FOM, thereby 
>> removing the contracts from (2) above. AFAIK this could have been 
>> implemented easily without causing backward incompatibility in accessing 
>> the FOM from JS/Jexl/JXPath.
>This change forces our users to rewrite their templates too?!?!?

Yes, it does.

View raw message