cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <>
Subject Re: FOM inconsistency (was Re: [VOTE] Unrestricting the FOM)
Date Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:32:30 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> I personally would remove this syntactic sugar completly; it's imho 
>> not intuitiv what it means and the inconsistent implementation adds to 
>> it.
>> In addition it would make our unified object model implementation (for 
>> flow, jxtg etc.) much easier as we don't have to simulate this in Java.
>> Unfortunately, I fear that this is common use, so let's deprecate it 
>> with 2.1.x and remove for 2.2 completly
> agree :-)
We have the same functionality in flow, e.g. you can get the value of a 
widget using the model with "model.WIDGETID". I think we should 
deprecate (and remove) this as well.

Can you start a formal vote about it?

Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG

View raw message