cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: Status new Cocoon documentation
Date Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:45:17 GMT
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> >David Crossley wrote:
> >>The trouble that i have with the new documentation proposal is that
> >>docs sources are moving to another part of the repository, so how
> >>will 'build docs' be able to access them? I suppose that assumed default
> >>relative pathnames with lots of dot-dots.
> >
> >A different part of the repository? Well, they'll according to the 
> >proposal, they'll soon be moving back into where they have always been 
> >in trunk (src/documentation). So I don't see what the problem is there.
> I think so too. After understanding now how it works, there shouldn't be 
> any problems as we can use the same behaviour in the future.

Great ... it turned into a non-issue.

> >Maybe you're referring to block documentation (for which there actually 
> >isn't any at the moment). This I guess would need to be dot-dots back to 
> >a checkout of the blocks repository or repositories - or more likely 
> >each block would have its own forrestbot setup (assuming that isn't too 
> >complex).

Not complex.

> If a block has its own docs repository (I will setup one for the Portal 
> block) it should also be built by forrestbot.

Let me know when you are ready and i will add it to brutus.

> David, do you have any further questions about "auto-docs"?

Not at this stage.


View raw message