Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42272 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 11:04:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 11:04:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 35829 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 11:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35783 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 11:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35753 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2005 11:04:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of ap-cocoon-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:04:28 -0800 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtkyG-00028u-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:04:24 +0100 Received: from host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it ([80.204.154.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:04:24 +0100 Received: from nicolaken by host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:04:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@cocoon.apache.org From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: [RT] Management Prototype? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:04:16 +0100 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <41F7604A.1010904@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <41F7604A.1010904@apache.org> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: ... > I know that there are a lot of pros and cons for/against JMX - the > discussion on the geronimo list is a good example of this. But it seems > that every project is using JMX, so imho we shouldn't "invent" something > different. Java 5 is using JMX to expose itself for monitoring. At this point IMO there is no real justification for anything other than JMX for management. +0 (good idea, no time for help) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------