Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64195 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 22:48:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 22:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 82404 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 22:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82346 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 22:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82328 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2005 22:48:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of peter.hunsberger@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.196 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:48:02 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so520536wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:48:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=kJSs/deBdu1FlHVgqDYPvNkUElsnsQUS2PfFiwMO0FKAZehufiDl4hvr53jdO8Vljn40DwK26w/xEK3mnureI73YtUzd0Y0vqWG5g/22kQ4zR6fv4K1VSbe0jVARTuoDm4tCaCqMceFYZx3Fbs7u7wzMqBgIQ8+ULhtQxmj74EE= Received: by 10.54.40.55 with SMTP id n55mr237299wrn; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.21 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:48:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:48:00 -0600 From: Peter Hunsberger Reply-To: Peter Hunsberger To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DBD357.1000802@apache.org> <34692.10.0.0.5.1104943544.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <34894.10.0.0.5.1104947818.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <41DC2E70.6080707@apache.org> <41DC2F82.600@apache.org> <38370a7d67a2c0d9a43068a.20050105104127.enycu.tbref@www.dslextreme.com> <35262.10.0.0.5.1104958570.squirrel@www.agssa.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:40:52 +0100, Ugo Cei wrote: > Il giorno 05/gen/05, alle 21:56, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto: > > > 1-UGLI: If Torsten comment related to the 2 parameter limit in UGLI is > > true, then UGLI is not a serious proposal. Should be discarded. It is > > only > > a bad produced syntax sugar. I must admit, the idea with more > > parameters > > is really cool. Maybe in the future we can adopt it. I know we don't > > have > > some too heavy logging requirements. I mean I need 10's of parameters > > or > > recursive logging. > > If you have more than two parameters, you can always use string > concatenation with an isDebugEnabled() guard. UGLI does not take away > anything in this regard. Yah, I just pointed that out a couple of messages ago and Torsten responded by asking why you shoudl bother switching in that case... -- Peter Hunsberger