Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9916 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2005 13:01:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2005 13:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 19717 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2005 13:01:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19305 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2005 13:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19292 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2005 13:01:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of geoff.howard@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.202 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:01:39 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so21237rne for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:01:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=h49kHLpjpLcnXE+25BiWY4s2BYSP/O8oZ4XJXp4wLCmAB4EjFDjEJyiYBz1msuhV3N5yO2Xd7KmAWylMAaHGWws9bXnC/gUs5x8EVP3vynnQrqm49G58dewCEUP0we0QF29Bm1/TpmiPEf/N6/VDQnctYYQUc0N1y5nZ0gGzq1Y= Received: by 10.38.15.71 with SMTP id 71mr266090rno; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.11.77 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:01:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <90a75eb105011205016bbacf69@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:01:37 -0500 From: Geoff Howard Reply-To: Geoff Howard To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: trunk build broken (Was: how to list all sitemap components) In-Reply-To: <20050112055731.GB6213@igg.indexgeo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <90a75eb1050111085571e05f04@mail.gmail.com> <35555.10.0.0.5.1105503942.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <20050112053538.GB6120@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <35935.10.0.0.5.1105508927.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <20050112055731.GB6213@igg.indexgeo.com.au> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:57:31 +1100, David Crossley wrote: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > Can you post where the problem is showed to you trying a full build? I am > > trying to get an idea if the problem is truly random or just because users > > have diferent blocks configurations in local.blocks.properties. The > > lastest seems to be the case, but lets to be sure. > > I showed that a few messages ago in this thread. > Both Ross and i are doing a full build, javadocs and all, > with no blocks disabled. It breaks in different places > for each of us. It looks like you've moved on past the need to understand this, but I think you're mistaken here, no? Ross is doing a default unmodified build, which has some blocks excluded by default. You're reporting all blocks enabled which would require some editing of the properties. I'd guess that Antonio has a separate set of blocks chosen, so this still may explain the different fail points, though it seems this is now just a curiosity in the larger problem. Unfortunately, time to crawl back into my hole. Thanks, Geoff