Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78100 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 20:11:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 20:11:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16175 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2005 20:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16135 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2005 20:11:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16121 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2005 20:11:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of joerg.heinicke@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from pop.gmx.de (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:11:33 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2005 20:11:30 -0000 Received: from pD9E04D6E.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.2]) (217.224.77.110) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 21:11:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <41F55672.2070306@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:11:30 +0100 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning 2.1.7 References: <41F29A71.6060502@apache.org> <41F499F4.5000808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41F499F4.5000808@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 24.01.2005 07:47, Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Anyway, as we agreed that 2.2 should come soon, I don't think it's worth > doing the refactoring. +1 Joerg