Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58303 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 05:53:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 05:53:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 65779 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 05:53:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 65743 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 05:53:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 65728 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2005 05:53:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (62.140.213.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:53:18 -0800 Received: (qmail 21670 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 05:53:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (stefano@127.0.0.1) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 05:53:15 -0000 Message-ID: <41DE23CE.6030607@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:53:18 -0500 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2 References: <41DBD357.1000802@apache.org> <41DC696C.2070209@apache.org> <41DCF283.8050409@apache.org> <39053904-5FED-11D9-AB46-000A95AC787E@apache.org> <41DD4F59.7030604@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41DD4F59.7030604@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hmm, I'm a little bit lost in this thread :( > > The easiest thing of course would be to just leave everything as it is > and move to a different subject. But using a logging framework that > noone else uses just feels not right for me. > > Has anyone a clue on how to procede? How about leaving everything as is and just change the default logger to be log4j instead of logkit? -- Stefano.