Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38906 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 01:18:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 01:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 78929 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2005 01:18:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 78535 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2005 01:18:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 78519 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2005 01:18:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from dd2020.kasserver.com (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:18:16 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (pD9E9D709.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.233.215.9]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6391953C9 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:18:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DC9213.1050106@apache.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:19:15 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041203) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2 References: <41DBD357.1000802@apache.org> <34692.10.0.0.5.1104943544.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <34894.10.0.0.5.1104947818.squirrel@www.agssa.net><41DC2E70.6080707@apache.org> <41DC2F82.600@apache.org> <38370a7d67a2c0d9a43068a.20050105104127.enycu.tbref@www.dslextreme.com> <35262.10.0.0.5.1104958570.squirrel@www.agssa.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >> very pythonish. I like it :-) > > > > ...but only with jdk 1.5 :-/ > > Not AFAIK. > > [1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ugli.html http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/ugli/ULogger.java?rev=1.2&view=markup Two paramters ...and variable arguments lists are only supported since java 1.5. So we would be back at constructing the Strings and need the isBlaEnabled check. ...so is there any other benefit over other logging abstractions? cheers -- Torsten