From dev-return-70569-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Fri Jan 21 14:07:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35253 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2005 14:07:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 14:07:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 80554 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2005 14:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 80495 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2005 14:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 80480 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2005 14:07:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of ap-cocoon-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:07:44 -0800 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CrzRr-0005MI-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:07:39 +0100 Received: from dyn-213-36-9-181.ppp.tiscali.fr ([213.36.9.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:07:39 +0100 Received: from eric.burghard by dyn-213-36-9-181.ppp.tiscali.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:07:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@cocoon.apache.org From: BURGHARD =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=C9ric?= Subject: Re: xml languages Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:08:07 +0100 Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: <41EFC809.5000902@nada.kth.se> <41F0C7DE.5030601@nada.kth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn-213-36-9-181.ppp.tiscali.fr User-Agent: KNode/0.8.2 Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I'm working on refactoring JXTG so that it will be easier to support and > develop. I'm aware about that you have access the request object etc Great ! Don't know if i can help (time), but if you have a road map or something like that, i would be happy to contribute. > differently depending on if you are using flow or not and also that the > eval tag is less well designed. What more weird behaviours are you > thinking of? Variable nature and scope (kind of non-mutable that you can overwrite ?), but someone could tell me this a feature :-). Perhaps i've miss something, but look what i need to do to retrieve a value incremented inside a forEach loop: ... ... ... this is my count: ${globalvars.a_count} It would be easiest (and efficient) to do ... ... this is my count: ${a_count} the fact that "set" make always a "new define" is quite annoying at first glance (functional programming ?). Regards.