From dev-return-69949-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Wed Jan 05 20:14:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54288 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 20:14:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 20:14:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 42250 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 20:14:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42183 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 20:14:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42167 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2005 20:14:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of peter.hunsberger@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.206 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:14:14 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so502541wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:14:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=A+Ihy1Wv+9Kp2BVpQgjn4+nITCpCAAFK2UTl/fOzKvzJe9k9H4gS0H8wgMbLZhU/yl25osw4VzfDSW//5ActKoVVUXWZdvAZc9weC4CeJCy3d5WkgyL/ClAQ/qWmx1dl1MHzh3gW3i30EGfRrcmTWAP4aLT+hC8M6hgUTE41YAg= Received: by 10.54.30.58 with SMTP id d58mr61529wrd; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.21 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:14:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:14:11 -0600 From: Peter Hunsberger Reply-To: Peter Hunsberger To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2 In-Reply-To: <41DC48B6.4030608@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DBD357.1000802@apache.org> <34692.10.0.0.5.1104943544.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <34894.10.0.0.5.1104947818.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <41DC2E70.6080707@apache.org> <41DC2F82.600@apache.org> <38370a7d67a2c0d9a43068a.20050105104127.enycu.tbref@www.dslextreme.com> <41DC48B6.4030608@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:06:14 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: other loggers > > > and it looks like -1 on UGLI from Torsten. > > Well, I doubt I have to give a -1 with > the given facts... :-P What's to stop everyone from continuing to just construct the Strings like they do today and not use the UGLI parameter substitution? Isn't the fact that it can do substitution on up to two parameters just the equivalent of some extra convenience methods? Or is there something else I missed? -- Peter Hunsberger