cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From oceatoon <t.katelb...@systheo.com>
Subject Re: Difference between FOM_Session and REal Session?
Date Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:32:49 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> I agree with that the behaviour is weird, but it is designed to be that
> way. What happens is that your data is always placed in the session data
>   in the servlet. But then the request object, session objects etc are
> placed in a different place if you use them from flow, comperd with how
> it is done in the rest of Cocoon. If you want to know all the details
> you can take a look at the setupView method in
> o.a.c.components.flow.javascript.fom.FOM_JavaScriptInterpreter and
> o.a.c.components.flow.javascript.fom.FOM_JavaScriptFlowHelper.
OK Thanks
> 
> The flow embeds the request object etc in some kind of dynaic map which
> makes them more convinient to use from flow and from expression
> languages. Then the object are placed in special places in the object
> model. I.e. not the same as all other Cocoon components use. JXTG gets
> the objects that are used in $cocoon from these places, check the setup
> and setContext methods in the original JXTG for details.
> 
> The result of this is that when you use JXTG without flow, the $cocoon
> object is empty except for $cocoon.parameters. For back compatibility
> and for making it possible to use whithout flow there are some
> deprecated variables $request, $session etc that uses the non emebeded
> object from the objectmodel. You have to use these if you don't use flow.
> 
> In the refactored JXTG I use o.a.c.environment.FlowObjectModelHelper,
> that Carsten wrote. It gets the objects from the normal places in the
> objectmodel and does the dynamic map embeding and puts everything in
> $cocoon. By using this we get the same behaviour booth in the flow and
> non flow context.
is this allready functionnal in JXTG2 ?




Mime
View raw message