cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean Pierre LeJacq <jplej...@quoininc.com>
Subject Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2
Date Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:02:51 GMT
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> Ralph Goers wrote:
> > So far we have:
> >
> > -1 on commons-logging (from Nicola)
> > -1 on log4j (from me)
> > -1 on jdk logger (from me - same reason as log4j)
> > and it looks like -1 on UGLI from Torsten.
> >
> > That leaves logkit and just4log (which I haven't looked at).  Unless
> > someone has something else?
>
> I don't want to escalate this unnecessarely, but the above should be
> treated as votes, not vetos.
>
> My point being: it might be wise not to change things too much ("if
> ain't broken don't fix it" and all that) but at the same time, it's
> getting kind of ridiculous that we are the only users of a particular API.
>
> Can you tell us more about why you can't have a direct dependency on log4j?

Along the same lines, what issues does the jdk logger have?  It
would seem to make the most sense in terms of long term community
support to use the jdk supported logging system.

-- 
JP



Mime
View raw message