cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Poetz <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject FOM & input modules
Date Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:30:34 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> So the question is, should we focus on making the FOM the main way of 
> accessing things in Cocoon or should we focus on IMs.
> 
> Carsten's suggestion IIUC is to focus on the FOM, something that I agree 
> completely with. 

I agree with this too.

If we do that we should have some kind of expression
> module that could replace all other IMs and that could be used like:
> 
> {ex:$cocoon/request/foo}
> 
> etc. By doing that people only have to learn FOM and can use that 
> everywhere. If we go this way we must see what IMs that do things that 
> not are part of FOM and maybe find a way to make them pluggable in FOM.

hmmm, than we could have something like

{$defaults/skin}
{$language/locale}

And as you can see, I think we can skip the input module name, if all objects 
are part of the plugable object model.

> The other alternative is to make IMs available in flow and JXTG. 

The like the idea of a plubable object model much more.

> In any 
> case we should be able to use everything that is usable from IMs in flow 
> and JXTG as well, so we should do something about it.

-- 
Reinhard

Mime
View raw message