cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leszek Gawron <lgaw...@mobilebox.pl>
Subject Re: dynamic macro junit test [was: jx : cocoon.request object ??]
Date Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:50:52 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
> 
>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your (and others) work is needed, so that we can make the 
>>>>>>> refactored JXTG stable enough for production use soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been trying to trace down the problem with non working 
>>>>>> dynamic macro test case. Funny thing is the same exception 
>>>>>> (NumberFormatException) gets thrown for "old" JXTG.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That at least means that I haven't broke it ;) It might even be 
>>>>> good that it doesn't work as that could mean that nobody use it and 
>>>>> it would be easier to deprecate and replace with something better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using it in my projects - and it works! This is one of most 
>>>> common technique of mine to write more advanced macros. Magic? I 
>>>> guess :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, then it would be good if you wrote a test case that works in the 
>>> original JXTG so that we can check that it still work in the 
>>> refactored version. I just took the example from the documentation 
>>> and made a test case from it.
>>
>>
>> I checked it - works only when the pipeline is invoked from flow. 
>> Still I have no idea how that affects parsing ${tags.example} expression.
> 
> 
> Neither have I, the test case only acceses variables that are defined in 
> the current context, so how what it got (or not got) from flow can 
> affect it is unclear to me.
> 
> Just to avoid missunderstandings, exactly what have you tested? Original 
> JXTG and refactored JXTG and for both: with and whithout flow?
Yes. Both JXTG and new JXTG work when called from flowscript and fail 
from standalone pipeline.

> 
> The problem (or at least one of them), seem to be connected to the 
> hashmap. I checked in a new test case: jxSet, that works for a simple 
> assignement but not for a hashmap.
Fine. I'll try to compare the results with previous versions of jxpath 
and jexl.

-- 
Leszek Gawron                                      lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager                                    MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                              http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65

Mime
View raw message