cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <dani...@nada.kth.se>
Subject Re: [RFC] Plugable Expressions
Date Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:08:23 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> 
>> They should, but I don't see how that is related to getNode/getValue? 
>> jx:set/@value uses getNode and jx:set/* executes the body and put the 
>> result in a DOM.
> 
> I see. I wasn't aware of the exact implementation here. Sorry for the 
> noise.
> 
> I have finally started to implement jx:call macro="${name}".
> 
> Some time ago we discussed about implementing an "internal taglib 
> design". What I mean every instruction was implemented as separate tag 
> (no new tags could be introduced). Parser would not depend on a specific 
> set of tags.

I'm working on that as you can see in Parser, the only thing that is 
left to be done is that jx:define need to run some code both in the 
start and the and tag. I have some ideas about what to do about that but 
  am not sure yet.

> Every Instruction in current JXTG apart from jx:macro could 
> be implemented completely separately. jx:macro depends on jx:parameters 
> parsed separately so the Parser needs to know the dependency details. 
> Same goes for future jx:call/jx:parameter. Could we do something about 
> that?

Hopefully but I don't know how yet, I'll research it further.

/Daniel

Mime
View raw message