Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>>>> Is there any technical reason to switch from the Avalon Logger
>>>> abstraction?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>>
>>
>> Well ...then that's no good reason to me.
>>
>> Rather I would also import the few classes
>> into out repository (like we did with ECM)
>> than doing the switch.
>>
> We can't import the classes in this case as these are interfaces. For
> ECM we could provide our own implementation, but - for now - we are
> still using the interfaces of the avalon framework. We agreed to move
> away someday from these interfaces - and part of this logging discussion
> is exactly about this: moving away from the avalon interfaces.
Carsten, too early. Now that avalon is closed, nobody is going to modify
those classes in a non-compatible way.
There is *less* to worry about now than in the past.
Let's try to act rationally people, if ain't broken, don't try to fix it.
--
Stefano.
|