cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Use UGLI as logging abstraction (Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2)
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:51:32 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
> 
>>>> Is there any technical reason to switch from the Avalon Logger
>>>> abstraction?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>>
>>
>> Well ...then that's no good reason to me.
>>
>> Rather I would also import the few classes
>> into out repository (like we did with ECM)
>> than doing the switch.
>>
> We can't import the classes in this case as these are interfaces. For 
> ECM we could provide our own implementation, but - for now - we are 
> still using the interfaces of the avalon framework. We agreed to move 
> away someday from these interfaces - and part of this logging discussion 
> is exactly about this: moving away from the avalon interfaces.

Carsten, too early. Now that avalon is closed, nobody is going to modify 
those classes in a non-compatible way.

There is *less* to worry about now than in the past.

Let's try to act rationally people, if ain't broken, don't try to fix it.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message