cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Use UGLI as logging abstraction (Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2)
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:38:52 GMT
>>>> Is there any technical reason to switch from the Avalon Logger
>>>> abstraction?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> Well ...then that's no good reason to me.
>>
>> Rather I would also import the few classes
>> into out repository (like we did with ECM)
>> than doing the switch.
>>
> We can't import the classes in this case as these are interfaces. For 
 > ECM we could provide our own implementation, but - for now - we are
 > still using the interfaces of the avalon framework.

...well interfaces then - whatever.

> We agreed to move 
> away someday from these interfaces - and part of this logging discussion 
> is exactly about this: moving away from the avalon interfaces.

They would no longer be the "avalon interfaces"
..or is the ECM++ still avalon?

What was the reason again to move exchange the
abstraction layer? ...not talking about the
implementation.

Sorry, guys this discussion getting a bit absurd to me.
--
Torsten

Mime
View raw message