Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Naming "ECM++" what's in org.apache.cocoon.core seems a bit weird now if
> we compare it to the original ECM. Lots and lots of things have changed.
> Furthermore, ECM stands for "Excalibur Component Manager" when this is
> the "Cocoon Core Service Manager".
>
> So what about using the CCSM acronym instead of ECM++?
>
> Sylvain
>
Hmm, ok, it was me who introduced the name "ECM++" as a *working title*.
Why do we need an acronym at all? IMHO just core or "our container"
should be sufficient.
Carsten
|