cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Logging in 2.2
Date Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:39:44 GMT
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:45:27 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler
> <cziegeler@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>In the past we had several arguments about why logkit is better and so
>>on but I think most of these arguments are not valid any more.
> 
> 
> Well, AFAIU a big one still stands true: security. I really hate the
> idea that other code can write to my channel just by doing a
> Logger.getLoggerFor(). 

That goes away with classloading isolation.

> But hey, that's life... all in all syslogd has
> been around for quite some time and works exactly that way, so let's
> move on. 

Agreed.

> I tend to back the UGLI logging interface ATM... 

Yeah, I think Nicola has good points. I also love the fact that UGLI 
doesn't mess with the classloader, making it easier for us to implement 
classloading isolation down the road.

> but I just
> love Torsten's just4log suggestion as well. Yeah, something I'm still
> missing is the good old -DDEBUG swistch...

I'm +0 on this.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message