Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22849 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2004 12:12:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2004 12:12:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 69145 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 12:11:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69002 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 12:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68967 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2004 12:11:53 -0000 Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:10:38 -0800 Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EB4C41B45 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:38:58 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: IWMgju8yyOtaE7rzpvU8pQ 1103197138 Received: from [192.168.1.74] (unknown [213.48.13.39]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB7B28689 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:38:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41C17358.6020906@upaya.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:36:56 +0000 From: Upayavira User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: review of sitemap component documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley wrote: > Okay the initial coordination table is now ready. > http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html > > The next task is to review the table to ensure that > all entries have been added for "sitemap components". Are you proposing to update all of the docs in 2.1.X and then later synchronise with trunk? I have just written up the RequestMethodSelector after an 'oh, aren't the docs crap' complaint on user list, and am not sure whether to put it in trunk as well or not. Regards, Upayavira