Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-69304-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39008 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 14:27:12 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 14:27:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 17155 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 14:25:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17016 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 14:25:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16928 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2004 14:25:26 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from essemtepe.nada.kth.se (HELO smtp.nada.kth.se) (130.237.222.115)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 06:25:21 -0800
X-Authentication-Info: The sender was authenticated as danielf using PLAIN at
 smtp.nada.kth.se 
Received: from nada.kth.se (cvap80.nada.kth.se [130.237.218.93])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.nada.kth.se (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB9EOuC5001207
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:24:56 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <41B86038.2070002@nada.kth.se>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:24:56 +0100
From: Daniel Fagerstrom <danielf@nada.kth.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308
X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] JXTG Refactoring
References: <802926B6AB8533408C33ADBCA3EE5C2AAD98E4@coso.staff.vuw.ac.nz>
    <41B771BD.6040707@mobilebox.pl> <41B80E08.1090905@nada.kth.se>
    <41B810B4.4000005@mobilebox.pl> <41B8145E.6070504@mobilebox.pl>
 <35055.10.0.0.5.1102583058.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
 <41B815CB.9030502@mobilebox.pl> <41B82E1D.6020203@nada.kth.se>
 <41B847CE.9060807@mobilebox.pl> <41B85D10.6020003@nada.kth.se>
In-Reply-To: <41B85D10.6020003@nada.kth.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
<snip/>

> For further refactoring I think that we should ...

Even more important is of course to add lots of test cases, so that we 
ensure high quality. For those who have corrected more or less subtle 
bugs in JXTG, consider adding a test case for it so that we can avoid 
regression.

Also, the refactored JXTG is supposed to be kept back compatible at all 
time, so the really adventuerous can consider switching from the 
original to the new JXTG in his/her sitemaps so that we can detect and 
correct regression as fast as possible (if you not are the kind of 
person that has a cron script that compile and install the latest Linux 
kernel from CVS each night in your production servers, you might want to 
avoid using the new JXTG for production yet, though ;) ).

/Daniel