Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50648 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 12:41:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 12:41:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 42872 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 12:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42769 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 12:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42752 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2004 12:40:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from v07274.home.net.pl (HELO v07274.home.net.pl) (212.85.125.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 04:40:50 -0800 Received: from sj162.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO ?192.168.1.62?) (lgawron.mobilebox@home@80.55.87.162) by matrix15.home.net.pl with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 12:40:46 -0000 Message-ID: <41B847CE.9060807@mobilebox.pl> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:40:46 +0100 From: Leszek Gawron User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RFC] JXTG Refactoring References: <802926B6AB8533408C33ADBCA3EE5C2AAD98E4@coso.staff.vuw.ac.nz> <41B771BD.6040707@mobilebox.pl> <41B80E08.1090905@nada.kth.se> <41B810B4.4000005@mobilebox.pl> <41B8145E.6070504@mobilebox.pl> <35055.10.0.0.5.1102583058.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <41B815CB.9030502@mobilebox.pl> <41B82E1D.6020203@nada.kth.se> In-Reply-To: <41B82E1D.6020203@nada.kth.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Leszek and I have started refactoring JXTG, by breaking it up in its > subclasses. Later we will work on creating more detailed interfaces > between the different parts and all the other stuff that has been > discussed on the list. > > Now the question is: where should this work take place? > > For the refactoring aspect its better to work on JXTG in core (BTW what > is the correct terminology, before we refered to code not being in a > block as core but now ECM++ is placed in a directory named core). > > But considering that we are going to add stuff, and make it a framework > for further template experiments, it makes more sense to place it in a > block. Also our long time plan is to remove as much as possible from > core, AFAIU. > > So what I propose is that we do the refactoring in the template block. > And that we call the refactored JXTG something else to avoid collisions > with the original one, e.g. JXTemplateGenerator2 or > o.a.c.template.generator.JXTemplateGenerator. I have commited an initial JXTemplateGenerator to o.a.c.template.jxtg.JXTemplateGenerator and moved Jonas' templating proposal to o.a.c.template.v2 package. Please review. -- Leszek Gawron lgawron@mobilebox.pl Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o. +48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65