Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <41B7FE15.6080107@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:26:13 +0100
From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: JDK 1.3, Forrest and Cocoon Upgrade
References: <41B74D8A.6060400@apache.org>
 <33273.10.0.0.5.1102545617.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
In-Reply-To: <33273.10.0.0.5.1102545617.squirrel@www.agssa.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 12:52, Reinhard Poetz dijo:
> 
>> > AFAIK there was no official vote but I found these mails by Carsten and
>> > Sylvain:
>> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109681547626264&w=2
>>
>>Have I missed the vote?
> 
> 
> I don't wrote this ;-)

maybe my second ego (I think Bertrand already got acquainted with him ...) ;-)

> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107821710911262&w=2
> 
> Follow the thread and seems we had an agreement. :-D

Here the missing summary:

+1  : Antonio, Stefano, Unico, Bruno
-0.5: Ugo, J�rg, Leo (nb), Reinhard, Pier

People who voted with -0.5 were not against 1.4 but said that this really needs 
a good usecase that can only be implemented (easily) with 1.4 and not with 1.3.

Not to end in a chicken-egg-situation, we agreed that 1.4 is the minimum for 2.2 
for now. When we are ready to release Cocoon 2.2 we will look through the code 
of Cocoon _core_ and if there is no major blocker we will support 1.3 again, if 
this is not possible, 1.4 will remain the minimum.

-- 
Reinhard