Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98351 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2004 17:47:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2004 17:47:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 68361 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2004 17:47:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68330 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2004 17:47:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68317 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2004 17:47:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (62.140.213.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:47:01 -0800 Received: (qmail 11112 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2004 17:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (stefano@127.0.0.1) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2004 17:46:57 -0000 Message-ID: <41B34991.4040903@apache.org> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:46:57 -0500 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Attribute Driven Templates References: <41B0D196.5080707@apache.org> <41B1B208.2080809@nada.kth.se> <41B2028F.7030606@nada.kth.se> <41B29076.4090007@apache.org> <41B2D9A7.4020203@apache.org> <41B2DDD4.3040802@mobilebox.pl> In-Reply-To: <41B2DDD4.3040802@mobilebox.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Leszek Gawron wrote: > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > >> But the Dreamweaver usecase is a valid one (It was me who started a >> discussion about this in May after attenting a Tapestry seminar at a >> conference) and so we should support it. >> >>> >>> Now, having them cohexist in the page smells like FS, though ;-) >> >> >> >> Can't agree more. > > What would you do then if you started simple (with attributes) and found > out after a while (when the template is already quite big) that you need > a tag syntax in some places? You come back here and ask for that feature. Clean design rule #1: avoid YAGNI. -- Stefano.