Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-68700-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79873 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2004 13:33:29 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2004 13:33:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 35785 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2004 13:33:21 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35722 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2004 13:33:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35687 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2004 13:33:19 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from v07274.home.net.pl (HELO v07274.home.net.pl) (212.85.125.162)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:33:18 -0800
Received: from sj162.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO ?192.168.1.62?)
 (lgawron.mobilebox@home@80.55.87.162)
  by matrix15.home.net.pl with SMTP; 1 Dec 2004 13:33:14 -0000
Message-ID: <41ADC821.9050201@mobilebox.pl>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:33:21 +0100
From: Leszek Gawron <lgawron@mobilebox.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: .
 src/blocks/template
 src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java
 src/blocks/template/java/org
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
 src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
 src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
 src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
References: <20041201115139.12232.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <41ADBDBD.5080501@nada.kth.se> <41ADBFF0.9060100@mobilebox.pl>
 <41ADC1EA.5080205@nada.kth.se> <41ADC2CE.4040409@upaya.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <41ADC2CE.4040409@upaya.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Upayavira wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> 
>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>
>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x 
>>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of 
>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more 
>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>
>>
>>
>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java 
>> 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by 
>> default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is 
>> contained in 1.3.
> 
> 
> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when it 
> reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough :-) )
> 
> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
I see, sorry for the mess. Should I disable the block build by default ?

-- 
Leszek Gawron                                      lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager                                    MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                              http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65