cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <sylv...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Design] JXTG 2.0 (Just say yes!)
Date Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:06:00 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:41, Glen Ezkovich a écrit :
>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:07, Vadim Gritsenko a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC we aggreed that we like the current syntax of JXTemplate. 
>>>>>> Exception: We deprecate the #{} notation in favour of ${xpath:....}.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If nobody said this already (I have 150 or so mails to go ...), 
>>>>> more than one EL per template is clear FS to me. I'd be in favor 
>>>>> of specifying EL at the TemplateGenerator declaration time, and 
>>>>> would not go more granular than this...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1, it might be good to have pluggable languages but run-time 
>>>> switching is definitely FS - and confusing as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you. Think this approach is applicable to the tag vs. 
>>> attribute debate?
>>
>>
>> Sure. Having mixed languages or mixed tag/attributes templating 
>> mechanisms in the same template sounds equally confusing.
>
>
> What about being able to mix Groovy's XML sytax with the the ordinary 
> one, wouldn't that be nice ;)


Ring! Ring! Ring! (Stefano's FS alarm bells)

:-)

Sylvain

-- 
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }


Mime
View raw message